By Wojtek Kolan - April 17, 2025
Form
W W W W L L W W W W
Form
L W L W L L W W W WBased on the implied probability from the moneyline, Lamens has a 68.94% chance to win this match.
PLEASE NOTE: Subscribe to the Matchstat.com tennis predictions club to show implied vs our accurate predictions to discover value bets in order to make successful bets.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | 68.94 % |
| Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah | 34.25 % |
|
Above is calculated from odds. Login now to get our expert picks. |
| Rajaonah | Stats | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (17-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (14-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 291 | Ranking | 69 |
| 290 | Highest Rank | 64 |
| 19 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 8 |
| 64% (102-57) | Career Total W/L | 58% (299-216) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $416,343 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
18 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
Suzan Lamens implied favourite from odds → 68.94%
No H2H Matches Available
Open Capfinances Rouen Metropole - Rouen
Clay| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Total Matches | 2 |
| 0:00:00 | Last Match | 0:00:00 |
| 4:32:54 | Total Time | 0:00:00 |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 64% (122/192) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (89/122) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (35/70) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (12/20) | Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (9/15) | Total Break Points Saved | 0% (0/0) |
| 80% (24/30) | Service Hold (%) | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (18/30) | Opponent Hold % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (103/204) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (227/396) | Total Points Won | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreak Win % | 100% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/0) |
| 0.50 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.00 |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing second serve performance over the past six months reveals that Rajaonah has won 41.51% of points on their second serve, slightly outperforming Lamens, who has secured 39.96% of those points. This statistic significantly correlates with predicting match outcomes, offering insight into their potential advantage in the upcoming match.
When examining return game statistics, Rajaonah has won 50.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has achieved 50.94%. For first serve returns, Rajaonah leads with 32.68% compared to Lamens’ 31.12%. These figures are particularly influential in predicting the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Assessing how players perform under pressure, Rajaonah has successfully saved 52.23% of breakpoints faced, compared to Lamens at 45.39%. This stat is crucial for making informed in-game betting predictions, emphasizing Rajaonah's composure during critical moments.
When reviewing overall performance over the past year, Rajaonah boasts a win rate of 61.76% (42 wins, 26 losses), slightly above Lamens’ 58.82% (40 wins, 28 losses). This percentage presents a comprehensive view of who might have the edge going into the match.
Rajaonah's superior surface performance stands out on clay, where they have a 68% win rate (83 wins, 39 losses), as opposed to a less favorable 45% on hard courts. Meanwhile, Lamens excels on clay with a 61% win rate (186 wins, 119 losses) and struggles on grass at 14% (1 win, 6 losses).
Delving into the match levels, Rajaonah primarily competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with a 60.32% win rate (38 wins, 25 losses), while Lamens competes at a higher level on the Main tour, securing a 62.5% win rate (20 wins, 12 losses). It is essential to relate these stats to the level of event they have been participating in for accurate predictions.
Examining the quality of opponents over the last 12 months, Rajaonah has faced players with an average rank of 194.75, whereas Lamens’ opponents averaged a rank of 200.13. This statistic aids in understanding the competitive environment each player has been exposed to.
In terms of deciding set performance, Rajaonah has won 56% of these sets over the past 12 months, slightly trailing Lamens, who has a 60% success rate in all tour matches. This could be a pivotal factor if the match extends to a deciding set.
In recent form, Rajaonah has converted 41.41% of breakpoint chances, outperforming Lamens, who converted 36.67% of theirs. These conversion rates are pivotal for live betting insights during breakpoint opportunities.
After considering all these factors, though closely contested, Rajaonah holds a slight statistical edge. Given their superior second serve performance, ability to save breakpoints, and overall match win rate, Rajaonah emerges as the favorite to win the match.
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Jessika Ponchet
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Emily Appleton
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
8
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
43
Total Points Won
46
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Ekaterine Gorgodze
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Anjali Rathi
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Samantha Imbo Nloga
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Suzan Lamens
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Marie Bouzkova
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
50 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Rajaonah Vs Lamens is now available here.
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (83/39) | Win/Loss | 61% (186/119) |
| 65% (180/97) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (403/286) |
| 57% (1461/1122) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3371/2880) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 112 | Aces Total | 417 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.48 |
| 484 | Total Double Faults | 1473 |
| 1:30:50 | Average Match Time | 1:23:37 |
| 205.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 260.24 |
| 65% (4766/7295) | 1st Serve % | 58% (9734/16844) |
| 61% (2897/4766) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (5883/9687) |
| 43% (1099/2529) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (3015/7182) |
| 50% (555/1120) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (1248/2343) |
| 50% (3780/7550) | Return Points Win % | 50% (8366/16805) |
| 68% (82/121) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (184/302) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (18/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (32/51) |
| 56% (19/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (49/82) |
| 91% (80/73) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (169/156) |
| 9% (80/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (169/13) |
| 24% (42/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (136/30) |
View full predicted draw for Rajaonah in Rouen
View full predicted draw for Lamens in Rouen
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
View Draw
